October, 2009


24
Oct 09

Lighter loads

As citizens of the world, we are directly involved in the residential and transportation sectors of energy use (and associated emissions) through purchase and use of electricity, natural gas, heating oil, and gasoline,in the U.S., about half of all that is produced. Indirectly, we are involved in the commercial and industrial half through our consumption of everything else – alas, the bedrock of our economy. So it is kind of about us.

Living consciously and making these connections in our daily lives can be challenging, no doubt about it. But sometimes altering seemingly insignificant patterns/habits can result in money saved, smaller carbon footprints, and even less stress.
Driving (one of the stressful parts) – it takes 2 gallons of oil to make a gallon of gas. Every mile driven is about a pound of CO2 emitted, besides all that went into making and getting that
gallon of gas! So certainly using less is the ticket.
+ Spend less time trying to find a close parking spot.
+ Change routes to avoid intersections where you often need to wait to turn left. (UPS has saved 3 million gallons of gas in year and delivered things quicker by systematically doing this.)
+ Release your foot from the gas when you see a red light or stop sign ahead.
+ Drive 5 or 10 mph more slowly on the freeway. Driving 60 instead of 70mph uses about 17% less fuel.
+ If you know that an event will cause some parking stress, consider carpooling or public transit, if walking or biking is not an option.
+ One could be radical and choose days without driving at all.

At home, besides only using lights when needed, the same could be applied to equipment – computers, and associated devices like speakers and printers; also tv, video, and stereo equipment.
Even when off, phantom loads are drawing current all of the time. Having these things plugged into power strips that you turn off could cut electricity use by at least 6%, some say more than 10%.

Flying – non-stop flights are far better than multi-legged ones, if a choice is possible/affordable.

Buying carbon offsets help with the rest. And hey, they may be guilt easers, but who can have a problem with funding renewable energy and planting trees?!

http://innovation.edf.org/page.cfm?tagid=23994

http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2009/04/10/vampire-energy-save-some-cash-

get-unplugged.html

^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~
Barbara Hirsch, recording engineer, eco-nut, of sorts

“Unless someone like you cares a whole lot, nothing is going to get
better. It’s not.”
– The Lorax, Children’s book by Dr. Seuss


8
Oct 09

US and energy

Having glanced at the world’s energy sources, let’s consider our own use. We consume energy in a few fundamental ways: electricity and gas or heating oil in our homes; transportation, e.g. cars, trucks, planes and public transit (can’t forget the garbage trucks!); and the goods we purchase, which are manufactured, packaged and shipped to stores or warehouses before we bring them home, use them and dispose of them or their dregs.
In the U.S. energy consumption by sector (2008) is:
Residential = 22%; Transportation = 28%; Commercial = 19%; Industrial = 31%

The following numbers* allow us a snapshot of relative energy consumption of all types, per capita,
around the world, a measure of material wealth, and certainly one of lifestyle.
Here are averages in global regions and a few of their countries as examples:

North America average = 276 (Canada 427, U.S. 335, Mexico 69)

Europe average = 146 (Gibraltar 2,066?!, Norway 411, U.K. 162, Italy 139, Albania 34)

Middle East = 127 (Qatar 1023, Israel 124, Yemen 12)

Eurasia = 161 (Russia 214, Georgia 29)

Central and South America = 53 (U.S. Virgin Islands 1851, Costa Rica 44, Haiti 3)

Asia and Oceania = 43 (Australia 277, Japan 179, China 56, Afghanistan 1)

Africa = 16 (Libya 132, South Africa 117, eleven countries are between 0 and 2)

As for just electricity, the U.S. produces and consumes the most – more than twice, per person – than that of the European Union.

*These numbers are the total energy use in millions of btu’s for 2006, of each country divided by its population, so it includes all industry and its exports (all imports would not be included.)

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/iea/wec.html

^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~ ^ ~
Barbara Hirsch

“Unless someone like you cares a whole lot, nothing is going to get
better. It’s not.”
– The Lorax, Children’s book by Dr. Seuss


2
Oct 09

CLIMATE Change

The climate around the Environmental Protection Agency is changing along with the greater one. Just a couple of days ago, they announced a proposal to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from very large power and industrial plants (hardly radical, only those emitting more than 25,000 tons of CO2 and other greenhouse gases each year) reversing one of the Bush administration’s final acts. Senate Republicans and industry groups are trying to challenge the EPA’s authority to do this under the CLEAN AIR Act. Fortunately, the Supreme Court ruled 2 years ago that the EPA could do, what it has just done.

The same day, the EPA also refused 79 coal mine operators permits for mountaintop removal, using the CLEAN WATER Act.

And on that day, Senators Kerry and Boxer introduced the CLEAN ENERGY Jobs and American Power Act (caps mine) which will encourage low carbon power generation, energy efficiency and job creation, fund research towards carbon capture and sequestration, nuclear waste management, and more. “Consider this simple fact: Every dollar spent on clean energy creates nearly four times as many jobs as an equal investment in oil and gas.”*

Three cheers for these CLEAN ACTS!

Some of us believe we all have responsibility to lower our own carbon and toxics footprint, (is there any good reason not to??). But though we are the consumers of what industry produces, the scale of change that is needed requires that governments must legislate, and must regulate industry, that which emits the greatest share of greenhouse gases and pollutants and on a daily basis changes the face of the planet.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/09/30/business/AP-US-Mining-EPA.html?scp=2&sq=coal%20mountain&st=cse

*http://kerry.senate.gov/cleanenergyjobsandamericanpower/pdf/Summary.pdf

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/01/science/earth/01epa.html?hp